As a Dedicated Free-Market Advocate, But Universal Medicare Represents the Top Hope for US Healthcare

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Expensive

According to a recent study, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would require contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee making average wages must contribute approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you contrast it to what the typical American pays. I know multiple clients that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to funding medical services. When you add these expenses versus what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

For America, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's military, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would render administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complex (and ineffective) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't have access to workers' medical records for weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses which hire more than half of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It enables for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a better and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare globally, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this current situation is that we take serious examination at ourselves and agree that big changes need to happen.

Shannon Richmond
Shannon Richmond

A tech strategist with over a decade in digital innovation, specializing in AI integration and sustainable tech solutions.