🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage may be the optimal choice for a audacious horror film centered on the biblical figure, though not for the causes many viewers might assume. Actually, Cage does not even play Jesus in The Carpenter’s Son: the part he plays is referred to merely as The Carpenter. He is framed as a father figure within this narrative, working to maintain his beliefs as The Boy (portrayed by the young actor), their now-teenage foster child, starts to display supernatural abilities. The reason it’s difficult to picture a different major actor in this role is that although the figure becomes stricken with numerous challenges, Cage himself looks practically touchingly certain that the gloomy, somber small film is a valuable project.

The Actor's Recent Projects

Cage was using those years more selectively recently. He yet makes additional projects than the majority of regular audiences could possibly view — as an illustration, were you informed that he has made several distinct frontier films over the last few years? — however he also includes prestige independent films like Dream Scenario, Pig, and Longlegs. This new film appears to be a similar project, because it’s genre-adjacent, possibly controversial, and takes a exaggerated description with gravity.

The Film's Storyline and Execution

Sadly, writer-director the director fails to repay viewer engagement. The Carpenter’s Son opens in a interestingly wandering setting, presented as based on an obscure religious text concerning the youthful days of the messiah. The Carpenter, the maternal figure, and the boy travel from place to place, afraid of doctrinal intolerance or doubt over The Boy’s mysterious gifts. “Calamity follows us,” Cage gloomily remarks. That continues when evil influences attack the household at their new home, getting a jump-start on that well-known scriptural test for the youth.

Occasionally, this production resembles an Exorcist-style supernatural thriller, except that not one of the main figures are clearly inhabited. On the contrary, they are more and more distant mutually, while these forces influence a nearby girl (Isla Johnston, listed as “The Stranger”) who the son bonds with, and provides everyone unsettling premonitions of a bleak destiny. The Carpenter in particular grapples with his position within the plot, at times berating the boy he can’t fully understand.

Debate and Sensitivity

The subject matter is prone to invite debate, and Nathan approaches it with plenty of care — overly, maybe. The concept of a teenage boy facing his destined offering and tempted by dark influences is certainly frightening, but Nathan may be wary of looking exploitative and anxious to signal his intentions, therefore he regularly retreats into darkly ominous visuals. The figures constantly ponder — FKA Twigs, who showed notable talent in the 2024 Crow remake, surprisingly — cedes her role to her Mother Mary cloak, sometimes broken up by several gruesome scary visuals.

The Star's Performance and Movie's Flaws

Meanwhile, Cage dabbles in exactly the kind of melodramatic acting that those who enjoy his campier roles could be expecting. There is a moment (also included) in previews where Cage flips out and shouts “My belief is broken!” If that kind of dramatic explosion is a component of a Jesus-themed horror movie, possibly a more openly absurd method would be more effective of Cage’s willingness to be extreme if needed. Rather, The Carpenter’s Son echoes the poorer low-budget productions he starred in through much of the last decade — apart from the B-movies so much as the dramas and ghost stories that always sound promising, and frequently include some select actor's highlights, but ultimately feel like, indeed, cheap home video fare.

Honestly, several of these, although simpler, were more watchable overall. Here is where I must break my own dogma, not religious but professional: Years back, an admired senior convinced me to remove adjectives like “tedious” or “uninteresting” from my film-criticism vocabulary. These phrases convey little but a subjective and generically described impatience, withdrawing from the task of clearly expressing the intellectual and emotional experience of viewing a specific film. It's challenging to express boredom without sounding boring personally. It’s no more expressive as terming a movie “notable.” “Say more,” in other words.

Yet, I acknowledge, I felt uninterested during much of the film. In its defense, it is a churchy kind of dullness, not due to this movie is moralizing, but because it demands a kind of patient acceptance to view it. After a while early on, the movie locks into a cyclic tempo of ongoing suffering, and never really