Skip to content
Thursday, October 15, 2026
ModernTrack

The Venezuelan Crisis May Now Determine Trump's Legacy - and America's Role in the World

In the wake of executing a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be entering the nation-building arena.

In a remarkable press conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief stated that US military forces had successfully seized Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a delegation comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be seizing the reins of the embattled nation.

"We are going to manage the country until such time as we can do a secure, proper and careful transition," he said.

What precisely "managing the nation" involves is unclear, but the commitment represents an abrupt policy reversal for the president, rife with contradictions and formidable challenges.

A leader who ran on opposing "endless conflicts", who vehemently denounced past US attempts at overthrowing governments and who promised to implement an "America first" international policy is now betting his administration on successfully rebuilding a South American nation whose economy is in ruins and whose governmental stability has been undermined by decades of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was persistently confident.

He claimed his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this will be no different. He vowed to recruit American oil firms to overhaul Venezuela's deteriorating production infrastructure, providing financing for the American rebuilding project and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He did not exclude sending American soldiers to Venezuela to advance these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to consider the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you shatter it, you are responsible for it."

A Shift in Foreign Policy

The US has altered Venezuela's destiny – whether for good or ill.

Trump entered office nearly a year ago pledging to be a diplomat, but over the past year he has demonstrated that he is quite prepared to use military force internationally.

In the past week, he ordered air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck atomic sites in Iran, suspected narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

Unlike previous actions, which have mostly involved rockets and warplanes that minimize the exposure of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his commitments to the future of that nation – are strikingly different.

His aim, he said during his briefing, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Reactions from Allies and Critics

That variation of Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra could be difficult for some of Trump's supporters to digest.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump ally who broke with the president after charging him of abandoning his political base, was swift to criticize the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's never ending use of force and backing for overseas conflicts is justified because we are forced to fund it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another notable Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on arms and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to reclaim confiscated US oil and stop fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers supported the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the military action against a "illegitimate government" as "decisive and warranted".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his appearance, the president said the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" agenda because it guaranteed US regional security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He resurrected the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American diplomatic policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Trump Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will not be questioned again."

The purpose of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "safeguard trade, territory and resources that are core to our national security." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's decision to capture Maduro will provoke broader concerns in international relations, however, and impact American relations with the world's other significant military powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry released a statement expressing shock and denouncing what it said was a irresponsible assault on a sovereign nation.

During the Biden administration, the US offered similar censures of Russia after its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to mediate a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has frequently seemed to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, voiced concern about the signal Trump's actions might send.

"My main worry is now Russia will use this to justify their illegal and barbaric operations against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an invasion of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic opponents were more direct.

"The United States should not be administering other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have understood by now not to get involved in perpetual conflicts and regime change missions that carry catastrophic consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a lawbreaker and a dictator with a record of rights violations. But he condemned Trump's choice not to inform congressional leaders prior to initiating the attack.

"Donald Trump has the legal duty to abide by the law and uphold institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First demands."

Trump, in his remarks, said that he opted not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "leak" particulars of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That military operation was a triumph – with no American casualties and limited damage to US equipment. Trump, with his typical confidence, portrayed the operation as a "daring raid" and "among the most astonishing, successful and impressive demonstrations of American military might and proficiency in American history."

Now he is staking his presidency on that victory continuing, as the US claims it will assume responsibility for running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that truly entails remains unknown. He and his team must fortify a nation that has been in turmoil for decades while stabilising a region that is sure to be wary of what Trump's international strategy has planned for them.

By

Shannon Richmond

A tech strategist with over a decade in digital innovation, specializing in AI integration and sustainable tech solutions.

ModernTrack

Type to search articles.